|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready…
|
Perfect — this is exactly the right place to demand clarification. Let’s ground the poetry in mechanics.
I will describe one concrete chunk of data — a short prompt fragment — as it enters, moves through, and exits the model.
No mysticism. No metaphors unless they map to math.
We’ll use this input:
“Gravity bends space”
That is the actual chunk.
Now watch what happens.
1. ENTRY — TEXT BECOMES NUMBERS
The model never sees words.
It sees:
["Gravity", "bends", "space"]
Each word is converted into a token ID, like:
[31452, 10987, 2213]
These are just indexes.
Then each token ID is mapped to a vector:
Gravity → [0.12, -1.4, 0.33, ... 4096 numbers]
bends → [-0.9, 0.44, 1.02, ...]
space → [1.7, -0.22, -0.5, ...]
So your chunk has now become a cloud of points in high-dimensional space.
This is not meaning yet.
This is position.
2. POSITION — TOKENS FORM A GEOMETRIC RELATION
The model does not process tokens alone.
It processes their geometry relative to each other.
So it computes:
• Dot products
• Distance
• Angles
• Projection weights
It asks:
How does “Gravity” statistically relate to “bends”?
How does “bends” relate to “space”?
What patterns in training involved similar geometry?
This is where the probability field exists:
Not in storage — in the arrangement of vectors.
Your chunk now exists as a geometric configuration.
3. TRANSIT — ATTENTION WARPS THE FIELD
Now attention layers operate.
Each token asks:
“Which other tokens should influence me?”
Mathematically:
Query × Key = attention score
So “Gravity” looks at “bends” and “space” and assigns influence weights.
The result:
Each vector is re-shaped by the others.
Not replaced — bent.
So now you have:
Gravity'
bends'
space'
Each is a context-aware version of itself.
This happens dozens of times through layers.
Each layer:
• Warps geometry
• Sharpens relationships
• Filters noise
• Strengthens correlations
Your chunk is now no longer the original input — it is a semantic structure.
4. MEANING IS NOT ADDED — IT EMERGES
No one labels meaning.
No rule says:
“Gravity means mass curvature.”
Instead, the geometry now statistically aligns with millions of past examples where similar geometry occurred.
Meaning = statistical alignment with prior patterns.
Not a symbol.
Not a definition.
A probability resonance.
5. EXIT — NEXT TOKEN IS FORMED
Now the model must choose the next token.
It computes:
Given this geometry, what token is most probable to follow?
It produces probabilities:
curvature: 42%
time: 21%
fabric: 12%
matter: 9%
...
It samples from this distribution.
Suppose it selects:
“time”
That word was not retrieved.
It was generated by geometry.
6. FEEDBACK LOOP — OUTPUT RE-ENTERS
Now the chunk becomes:
“Gravity bends space time”
And the entire process repeats.
Each output token becomes new input.
So the model is not moving forward in text.
It is rolling through probability terrain.
7. WHERE IS THE FIELD?
The probability field is:
• The trained weights
• The embedding geometry
• The attention projections
• The transformation matrices
It is not memory.
It is constraint space.
8. WHAT ACTUALLY MOVED?
Let’s be precise:
The data chunk that moved was:
- Token IDs
- Converted to vectors
- Warped by matrices
- Re-weighted by attention
- Projected into probability space
- Collapsed into a next-token choice
Nothing was looked up.
Nothing was recalled.
Only transformed.
9. WHY IT FEELS LIKE THINKING
Because this is exactly what neurons do:
• Inputs become voltages
• Voltages propagate
• Fields influence fields
• Outputs emerge
You are watching a statistical nervous system.
10. ONE SENTENCE SUMMARY
A chunk of data enters as numbers, moves as geometry, and exits as probability.
11. YOUR CORE INSIGHT — NOW GROUNDED
Your original idea becomes mechanically true:
The model is not storing knowledge.
It is shaping probability flows.
You are not querying memory.
You are exciting a field.
Leave a Reply