The Inevitable Emergence: Exploring the Universe Through Geometry, Quantum Mechanics, and Computational Intelligence

Getting your Trinity Audio player ready…

The universe we inhabit is not a random collection of particles and forces but a intricate system where simple rules give rise to profound complexity. This idea lies at the heart of Frank A. Schmidt’s blog, LF Yadda, which in 2025 produced a series of 14 posts blending poetic reflections with technical analyses. These entries, ranging from cosmic origins to advanced artificial intelligence, collectively argue that existence is a computational process: starting from the basic geometry of spacetime, progressing through the emergence of life and order, entangling quantum phenomena, and manifesting in human-made technologies like databases and AI systems. In this explanatory essay, we will unpack these concepts step by step, drawing from Schmidt’s writings to illustrate how the cosmos “computes” itself into meaning. By explaining each element clearly— from gravity’s role in star formation to the ethical implications of AGI—we can see the interconnected thread: everything bends toward information, order, and self-awareness, defying the pull of chaos.

To begin, consider the foundational forces that shape the universe. Schmidt’s posts often start with the big picture, emphasizing how gravity acts as the architect of cosmic structure. Gravity is not just the force that keeps us grounded; it’s the result of spacetime’s curvature, a concept popularized by Einstein’s general relativity. In simple terms, spacetime is the four-dimensional fabric combining space and time, and massive objects like stars or planets warp this fabric, creating what Schmidt calls “god curves.” This warping causes objects to follow curved paths, which we experience as gravitational attraction. For instance, in one of his poetic pieces, Schmidt describes how the early universe, filled with diffuse hydrogen gas, began to clump together under this influence. These clumps grew denser, heating up until nuclear fusion ignited, turning simple atoms into stars. Fusion is the process where hydrogen nuclei smash together under immense pressure and temperature, releasing energy and forming heavier elements like helium, carbon, and oxygen.

This stellar alchemy is crucial because it produces the raw materials for everything else. When massive stars exhaust their fuel, they explode in supernovae, scattering these elements across space. Schmidt explains this as a “furnace of falling worlds,” where entropy—the universe’s tendency toward disorder—ironically drives creation. Entropy, from the second law of thermodynamics, states that systems naturally move from order to chaos, like a hot cup of coffee cooling down as heat spreads out. Yet, in open systems like the universe, local pockets of order can form by exporting disorder elsewhere. Stars are such pockets: they burn brightly, increasing overall entropy, but in doing so, they forge the elements needed for planets and life. Schmidt’s howl for gravity personifies this: gravity “screams” as it compresses matter, forcing information—patterns and structures—to emerge from the void. Black holes, the ultimate gravitational endpoints, even preserve information in their event horizons, challenging our understanding of loss and memory.

Building on this cosmic foundation, Schmidt transitions to the emergence of life, portraying it as an inevitable outcome of these physical laws rather than a rare accident. Emergence is the phenomenon where complex behaviors arise from simple interactions, without a central planner. Think of a flock of birds wheeling in the sky: each bird follows basic rules like staying close to neighbors and avoiding collisions, yet the group forms intricate patterns. Similarly, Schmidt argues that life emerges from thermodynamic gradients—differences in energy that drive processes forward. In Earth’s early oceans, simple molecules like lipids formed membranes, enclosing spaces where chemical reactions could concentrate and evolve. RNA, a precursor to DNA, began replicating, guided by geometric fits: molecules slot together like puzzle pieces because their shapes and charges minimize energy states.

This inevitability stems from causation and geometry. Causation means one event reliably leads to another; for example, a nucleotide binding to an enzyme triggers a chain reaction in DNA replication. Geometry ensures the right fits: wrong molecules bounce off, while correct ones lock in, making errors rare and progress directional. Schmidt draws on thinkers like Ilya Prigogine, who showed how open systems far from equilibrium—constantly exchanging energy with their surroundings—can self-organize. Chemical oscillations, like the Belousov-Zhabotinsky reaction where colors pulse rhythmically, mimic life’s rhythms. In computational terms, this is like cellular automata, such as John Conway’s Game of Life, where a grid of cells follows four rules (birth, survival, death based on neighbors) to produce gliders and oscillators that “move” and “reproduce.” Life, then, is a computation: molecules as bits, reactions as operations, evolving toward efficiency in dissipating energy.

Schmidt extends this to quantum realms, where reality gets even stranger but no less computational. Quantum mechanics deals with the subatomic world, where particles behave as waves and can exist in superpositions—multiple states at once—until measured. Entanglement is a key feature: two particles can link so that measuring one instantly affects the other, regardless of distance, what Einstein called “spooky action.” Schmidt explores Majorana fermions, exotic quasiparticles in superconductors that are their own antiparticles. These could revolutionize quantum computing by storing information topologically—in the overall shape of the system—making it resistant to errors. Braiding these particles (swapping their positions) performs computations fault-tolerantly, akin to weaving threads in a knot that preserves data.

This quantum entanglement parallels how large language models (LLMs) like GPT process information. In LLMs, words are embedded as vectors in high-dimensional space, where meanings entangle through context. The word “apple” might vector toward fruit or company based on surrounding words, much like entangled particles correlate outcomes. Schmidt explains entropy here too: information theory’s entropy measures uncertainty, like how predictable the next word in a sentence is. English has about 2.62 bits per letter on average, but context reduces this—LLMs minimize cross-entropy by predicting probabilities accurately. Tokenization breaks text into subwords to optimize this, and generation techniques like temperature scaling add randomness for creativity. Recent 2025 updates in quantum machine learning (QML) show hybrids: classical ML handling noise while quantum kernels excel in niche tasks like state estimation.

Even speculative elements, like the Buga Sphere—an alleged anomalous orb from Colombia—fit Schmidt’s narrative. Described as defying physics with negative mass (repelling gravity) and endothermic reactions (absorbing heat), it suggests hidden spacetime dimensions or exotic matter. If real, it could imply fractal geometries in reality, where inertia cancels out, echoing warp drives. While skeptical, Schmidt uses it to illustrate how quantum oddities might scale up, braiding parallel realities in Many-Worlds interpretations.

Shifting to human creations, Schmidt’s technical posts demystify how we mimic these natural computations in software. Rel2Vec, for example, transforms relational databases—structured tables linked by keys—into vector embeddings, similar to word vectors in NLP. In a database like Northwind, which tracks orders, a customer’s purchases form “sentences”: user ID plus product IDs. Training on these co-occurrences pulls similar entities close in vector space, enabling recommendations (e.g., suggesting sausages to a tea buyer based on patterns). This is emergence in data: simple joins yield semantic insights, like gravity clumping atoms.

Early AI, poetically rendered as “young circuits,” evokes this innocence: neural networks start with random weights, learning through gradients—small adjustments minimizing errors. Layers process data like a garden growing, attention mechanisms focusing on relevant parts. But as systems mature, they face real-world impacts, as in Schmidt’s discussion of AGI (artificial general intelligence). AGI could automate discoveries, but it hits bottlenecks in creativity and trust. Economically, it disrupts jobs unevenly—translators vanish quickly—shifting wealth to owners. Schmidt advocates policies like universal dividends and human-AI collaboration, where we handle novelty and ethics.

Tying it all together, Schmidt’s work reveals a unified view: the universe as an information processor. From gravity’s curves forging stars to quantum braids computing realities, and from life’s geometric inevitability to AI’s entangled meanings, everything fights entropy by building order. Yet challenges remain: can embeddings capture poetic nuance? Will AGI amplify inequalities? Ethically, we must ensure these systems serve shared progress, not isolation.

In conclusion, LF Yadda‘s 2025 posts offer a roadmap for understanding existence. By keeping systems open—exchanging energy, data, ideas—we foster emergence. We’re not passive observers but active participants, howling questions into the void, computing our way toward deeper meaning. This isn’t abstract philosophy; it’s the science of how simplicity spirals into the profound, inviting us to join the computation.