Getting your Trinity Audio player ready…

Abstract

This paper explores the application of three modern theories of biological evolution – Neo-Darwinism, Denis Noble’s theory of Biological Relativity, and Lee Cronin’s Assembly Theory – to the evolution of music. By drawing parallels between biological and musical evolution, we aim to provide new insights into the processes that shape musical development and diversification over time. The paper examines how concepts such as variation, inheritance, selection, multi-level causation, and complexity can be applied to understand musical phenomena. Through analysis of various musical genres and historical developments, we demonstrate the potential of these evolutionary frameworks to enrich our understanding of musical change while also acknowledging the limitations of such biological analogies in the cultural sphere.

1. Introduction

The evolution of music, like the evolution of biological organisms, is a complex and multifaceted process that has long fascinated scholars across various disciplines. While the comparison between biological evolution and cultural evolution is not new (Dawkins, 1976; Mesoudi, 2011), recent advances in evolutionary theory provide fresh perspectives on how we might understand the development and diversification of music over time.

This paper aims to explore how three modern theories of biological evolution can be applied to our understanding of musical evolution:

1. Neo-Darwinism (also known as the Modern Synthesis)
2. Denis Noble’s theory of Biological Relativity
3. Lee Cronin’s Assembly Theory

By examining these theories and their potential applications to music, we seek to:

a) Identify parallels between biological and musical evolutionary processes b) Gain new insights into the mechanisms of musical change and diversification c) Explore the strengths and limitations of biological analogies in understanding cultural phenomena

The interdisciplinary nature of this inquiry reflects the growing recognition of the value of cross-pollination between the sciences and humanities (Wilson, 1998). By applying biological concepts to musical evolution, we may not only enrich our understanding of musical development but also shed light on the broader relationship between cultural and biological evolution in shaping the human experience.

2. Neo-Darwinism and Musical Evolution

2.1 Overview of Neo-Darwinism

Neo-Darwinism, also known as the Modern Synthesis, combines Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution by natural selection with Mendelian genetics and population genetics (Huxley, 1942). This framework emphasizes the role of genetic variation, inheritance, selection, and drift in shaping the evolution of species. Key principles include:

1. Variation: Random genetic mutations and recombination create diversity within populations.
2. Inheritance: Genetic information is passed down from parents to offspring.
3. Selection: Traits that enhance survival and reproduction are more likely to be passed on to future generations.
4. Drift: Random changes in allele frequencies can occur, especially in small populations.

2.2 Applying Neo-Darwinian Concepts to Music

When applied to music, we can draw several parallels with Neo-Darwinian principles:

2.2.1 Variation in Music

In music, variations can be seen as new musical ideas, techniques, or styles introduced by composers and performers. These might include:

• Novel chord progressions or harmonic structures
• Innovative rhythmic patterns
• Unique instrumentation or orchestration choices
• New production techniques or sound manipulation methods

For example, the introduction of the distorted guitar sound in rock music, pioneered by artists like Link Wray and The Kinks in the 1950s and 1960s, can be seen as a significant variation that influenced the development of numerous rock subgenres (Shepard, 2003).

2.2.2 Inheritance in Music

Musical inheritance can be understood as the transmission of musical ideas, techniques, and styles from one generation of musicians to the next. This occurs through various mechanisms:

• Formal music education and conservatory training
• Informal learning through exposure to existing music
• Apprenticeship and mentorship relationships between musicians
• Written musical notation and recorded performances

The concept of musical inheritance is evident in the development of classical music traditions, where compositional techniques and performance practices have been passed down through generations of composers and musicians (Grout & Palisca, 1996).

2.2.3 Selection in Music

In the context of music, “selection” can be seen as the process by which certain musical elements gain popularity and are more frequently replicated. This could be driven by various factors:

• Cultural preferences and societal values
• Technological advancements that enable new forms of music creation and consumption
• Economic considerations, such as commercial viability
• Psychological and physiological responses to certain musical features

An example of musical selection can be observed in the rise of electronic dance music (EDM) in the late 20th and early 21st centuries. The popularity of EDM was driven by a combination of technological advancements in music production, changing cultural attitudes towards dance music, and the physiological effects of repetitive rhythms on listeners (Butler, 2006).

2.2.4 Drift in Music

Musical “drift” can be understood as changes in the prevalence of certain musical elements due to chance events or small population sizes, particularly in isolated musical communities. This concept helps explain:

• The development of unique regional musical styles
• The loss of certain musical traditions over time
• The emergence of niche subgenres with dedicated but small followings

An example of musical drift can be seen in the development of isolated folk music traditions, such as the unique fiddle styles that evolved in different regions of the Appalachian Mountains (Milnes, 1999).

2.3 Case Study: The Evolution of Rock and Roll

Using this Neo-Darwinian framework, we can analyze the evolution of rock and roll in the 1950s:

1. Variation: Rock and roll emerged from the blending of elements from blues, country, and R&B. Artists like Chuck Berry and Little Richard introduced variations in rhythm, instrumentation, and performance style (Palmer, 1992).
2. Inheritance: Musical techniques and styles were inherited from predecessor genres. For example, the 12-bar blues structure and the use of guitar as a lead instrument were inherited from blues traditions (Friedlander, 2006).
3. Selection: The popularity of rock and roll among young audiences was driven by cultural and social factors of the time, including post-war economic prosperity, the rise of youth culture, and changing attitudes towards race relations in the United States (Ennis, 1992).
4. Drift: The emergence of regional subgenres, such as the “Sun Sound” associated with Sun Records in Memphis, can be seen as a form of musical drift resulting from the influence of local musical traditions and the isolation of early rock and roll scenes (Escott & Hawkins, 1991).

2.4 Limitations of the Neo-Darwinian Approach

While the Neo-Darwinian framework provides valuable insights into musical evolution, it has several limitations:

1. Intentionality: Unlike genetic mutations, musical innovations are often the result of conscious, goal-directed efforts by composers and performers.
2. Rapid change: Musical evolution can occur much more rapidly than biological evolution, with new genres and styles emerging within a single generation.
3. Cultural factors: The Neo-Darwinian model may oversimplify the complex cultural, social, and technological factors that influence musical evolution.
4. Non-linear development: Musical evolution often involves the revival of “extinct” forms or the intentional combination of disparate elements, which doesn’t have a clear parallel in biological evolution.

3. Denis Noble’s Biological Relativity and Musical Evolution

3.1 Overview of Biological Relativity

Denis Noble’s theory of Biological Relativity challenges the gene-centric view of Neo-Darwinism and proposes a more holistic understanding of biological systems (Noble, 2012). Key aspects of this theory include:

1. Multi-level causation: Biological phenomena are influenced by interactions at multiple levels of organization, from genes to cells to organisms to ecosystems.
2. Downward causation: Higher-level systems can influence and constrain lower-level components.
3. Network interactions: The focus is on the interactions between components rather than the components themselves.
4. Stochasticity and determinism: Biological systems exhibit both random and predictable behaviors at different levels of organization.

3.2 Applying Biological Relativity to Music

Noble’s approach provides a more nuanced framework for understanding musical evolution, acknowledging the complex interplay of various factors beyond simple selection and replication.

3.2.1 Multi-level Causation in Music

We can consider musical evolution as occurring at multiple interconnected levels:

1. Individual level: Composers and performers creating and interpreting music
2. Group level: Bands, orchestras, and other musical ensembles
3. Genre level: The development and interaction of different musical styles
4. Cultural level: Broader societal influences on music
5. Technological level: The impact of instruments and recording technologies

Each of these levels influences the others, creating a complex web of interactions that shape musical evolution. For example, the development of jazz in the early 20th century involved interactions between:

• Individual innovators like Louis Armstrong and Duke Ellington
• Ensemble dynamics in early jazz bands
• The evolution of jazz as a distinct genre
• The cultural context of African American communities in New Orleans and other urban centers
• Technological developments in instrument design and recording techniques

3.2.2 Downward Causation in Music

Just as higher-level biological systems can constrain and influence lower-level components, we can observe similar phenomena in music:

1. Cultural expectations and norms influencing individual musical choices Example: The expectations of sonata form in classical music constraining composers’ structural choices
2. Genre conventions shaping the creative decisions of composers and performers Example: The verse-chorus structure in pop music influencing songwriting approaches
3. The limitations and possibilities of available technology affecting musical composition and performance Example: The characteristics of early synthesizers shaping the sound of 1980s electronic pop music
4. Economic and institutional factors influencing musical production Example: The music industry’s promotion of certain genres or artists affecting the visibility and development of musical styles

3.2.3 Network Interactions in Music

Viewing musical evolution through the lens of network interactions emphasizes the connections between different musical elements, genres, and cultural contexts. This perspective can help explain phenomena such as:

1. The fusion of different musical styles to create new genres Example: The blending of jazz and rock to create jazz fusion in the late 1960s and early 1970s
2. The co-evolution of music and dance forms Example: The interrelationship between salsa music and salsa dancing
3. The interplay between music and other art forms or cultural expressions Example: The relationship between hip-hop music and graffiti art as elements of hip-hop culture
4. The influence of social and political movements on musical development Example: The role of the civil rights movement in shaping the content and style of 1960s protest music

3.2.4 Stochasticity and Determinism in Music

Noble’s recognition of both random and predictable elements in biological systems has parallels in music:

1. Stochastic elements:
   • The unpredictable nature of individual creativity and innovation
   • The chance encounters and collaborations that lead to new musical directions
   • The random fluctuations in popularity of certain musical styles
2. Deterministic elements:
   • The constraints imposed by musical theory and tradition
   • The predictable patterns of tension and release in musical composition
   • The influence of social and economic factors on musical trends

3.3 Case Study: The Evolution of Electronic Dance Music (EDM)

Analyzing the development of EDM through the lens of Biological Relativity provides a rich understanding of its evolution:

1. Multi-level causation:
   • Individual level: Pioneering producers like Kraftwerk, Juan Atkins, and Frankie Knuckles
   • Group level: The dynamics of DJ culture and club scenes
   • Genre level: The emergence and differentiation of subgenres like house, techno, and trance
   • Cultural level: The influence of rave culture and youth movements
   • Technological level: The development of synthesizers, drum machines, and digital audio workstations
2. Downward causation:
   • The limitations and possibilities of early synthesizers and drum machines shaping the sound of early EDM
   • The expectations of club environments influencing track structures and dynamics
   • The norms of DJ culture affecting production techniques (e.g., the importance of mixable intros and outros)
3. Network interactions:
   • The ongoing dialogue between EDM and other genres (e.g., the influence of disco on house music)
   • The relationship between EDM and visual arts in club environments
   • The interplay between EDM and drug culture
4. Stochasticity and determinism:
   • Stochastic: The unpredictable emergence of new subgenres and regional scenes
   • Deterministic: The consistent use of four-on-the-floor beats and build-up/drop structures in many EDM tracks

3.4 Advantages and Limitations of the Biological Relativity Approach

Advantages:

1. Provides a more holistic understanding of musical evolution
2. Acknowledges the complex interplay of various factors beyond simple selection
3. Allows for analysis of musical phenomena at multiple levels of organization
4. Recognizes both top-down and bottom-up influences in musical development

Limitations:

1. Increased complexity may make it challenging to formulate testable hypotheses
2. The multitude of interacting factors can make it difficult to identify primary drivers of musical change
3. The approach may not fully account for the role of individual agency and intentionality in musical creation

4. Lee Cronin’s Assembly Theory and Musical Evolution

4.1 Overview of Assembly Theory

Lee Cronin’s Assembly Theory is a recent contribution to evolutionary biology that focuses on the complexity and history-dependence of biological systems (Cronin et al., 2021). Key aspects of this theory include:

1. Assembly Index: A measure of the complexity of a system based on the number of parts and the steps required to assemble them.
2. Selection by persistence: Systems that are more likely to persist and be copied are favored.
3. Importance of context and history: The evolutionary path of a system is influenced by its environment and past states.
4. Emergence of function: Complex systems can exhibit functions that are not predictable from their individual components.

4.2 Applying Assembly Theory to Music

Cronin’s Assembly Theory offers a unique perspective on musical evolution, emphasizing complexity, persistence, and historical contingency.

4.2.1 Assembly Index in Music

We can consider the complexity of musical pieces or genres in terms of their “assembly index”:

1. The number of distinct musical elements:
   • Instruments and timbres used
   • Rhythmic patterns and time signatures
   • Harmonic structures and chord progressions
   • Melodic motifs and phrases
   • Production techniques and effects
2. The complexity of arrangements and production techniques:
   • Layering of multiple instrumental and vocal tracks
   • Use of complex signal processing and sound design
   • Integration of acoustic and electronic elements
3. The cultural and historical knowledge required to fully appreciate or reproduce the music:
   • Understanding of genre conventions and historical context
   • Familiarity with specific performance techniques or traditions
   • Knowledge of relevant cultural references or lyrical content

Example: The increasing complexity of progressive rock in the 1970s, as exemplified by bands like Yes and King Crimson, can be analyzed in terms of its high assembly index:

• Use of complex time signatures and polyrhythms
• Integration of classical music structures and jazz improvisation
• Incorporation of emerging synthesizer technology
• Intricate lyrical concepts and album-length compositional structures

4.2.2 Selection by Persistence in Music

In the context of music, “selection by persistence” could be interpreted as the tendency for certain musical elements, styles, or pieces to endure and be replicated over time. This persistence might be driven by factors such as:

1. Emotional resonance with listeners Example: The enduring popularity of certain chord progressions, such as the I-V-vi-IV progression in pop music
2. Cultural significance Example: The persistence of traditional folk melodies in classical music compositions
3. Ease of reproduction or teaching Example: The prevalence of simple, repetitive rhythms in many popular music genres
4. Adaptability to new contexts or technologies Example: The continued use of drum machine patterns from early hip-hop in contemporary electronic music
5. Institutional support and canonization Example: The persistence of certain classical music repertoire in concert programming and music education

4.2.3 Importance of Context and History in Music

Assembly Theory’s emphasis on the role of context and history in shaping evolutionary trajectories is particularly relevant to music:

1. The influence of cultural and historical contexts on musical development Example: The impact of post-war social changes on the emergence of rock and roll in the 1950s
2. The way in which earlier musical forms and techniques shape later innovations Example: The influence of West African rhythmic patterns on the development of jazz and blues in the United States
3. The impact of technological advancements on musical possibilities Example: The evolution of electronic music in response to developments in synthesizer and computer technology
4. The role of social and political movements in shaping musical content and style Example: The influence of the 1960s counterculture on the lyrical themes and musical experimentation of psychedelic rock

4.2.4 Emergence of Function in Music

The concept of emergent function in Assembly Theory can be applied to music in several ways:

1. Emotional and psychological effects: The ability of certain combinations of rhythm, harmony, and melody to evoke specific emotional responses that are not predictable from the individual elements alone.
2. Social and cultural functions: The role of music in creating social cohesion, expressing cultural identity, or facilitating ritual practices.
3. Cognitive effects: The impact of music on memory, learning, and cognitive performance, which emerges from the interaction of various musical elements.
4. Physical and physiological responses: The ability of music to induce movement, alter heart rate, or influence brain activity in ways that are not directly predictable from its component parts.

4.3 Case Study: The Evolution of Hip-Hop

Analyzing the development of hip-hop through the lens of Assembly Theory provides valuable insights:

1. Assembly Index:
   • Early hip-hop (1970s-1980s) had a relatively low assembly index, often using simple drum machine patterns, turntable techniques, and straightforward rhyme schemes.
   • Over time, the assembly index increased with:
     • More complex sampling and layering techniques
     • Integration of live instrumentation
     • Development of intricate rhyme patterns and wordplay
     • Incorporation of diverse musical influences (jazz, rock, electronic music)
     • Advanced production techniques and sound design
2. Selection by Persistence:
   • Certain rhythmic patterns (e.g., the “boom bap” beat) have persisted due to their effectiveness in facilitating rhyming and dancing.
   • Specific vocal delivery styles and lyrical themes have endured, evolving into established hip-hop traditions.
   • The practice of sampling itself has persisted, adapting to legal and technological changes.
3. Importance of Context and History:
   • The roots of hip-hop in African American and Caribbean musical traditions shaped its early development.
   • The socioeconomic conditions of the South Bronx in the 1970s influenced the lyrical content and DIY ethos of early hip-hop.
   • Each era of hip-hop builds upon and responds to previous styles, creating a complex historical narrative.
4. Emergence of Function:
   • Hip-hop emerged as a multifaceted cultural movement, incorporating music, dance, visual art, and fashion in ways not predictable from its individual components.
   • The genre developed social and political functions, becoming a voice for marginalized communities and a tool for social commentary.

4.4 Advantages and Limitations of the Assembly Theory Approach

Advantages:

1. Provides a framework for quantifying and comparing musical complexity across genres and time periods.
2. Emphasizes the importance of historical context in understanding musical evolution.
3. Offers insights into why certain musical elements persist while others fade away.
4. Recognizes the emergent properties of music that arise from the combination of simpler elements.

Limitations:

1. The concept of “assembly index” may be challenging to quantify precisely for all aspects of music.
2. The theory may not fully account for the role of individual creativity and innovation in musical development.
3. The focus on complexity and persistence might undervalue the importance of simplicity and novelty in some musical contexts.

5. Comparative Analysis and Synthesis

5.1 Complementary Insights from the Three Theories

Each of the three theories examined – Neo-Darwinism, Biological Relativity, and Assembly Theory – offers unique and complementary insights into the evolution of music:

1. Neo-Darwinism provides a framework for understanding the basic mechanisms of variation, inheritance, and selection in musical evolution. It helps explain how new musical ideas arise, spread, and either persist or fade away over time.
2. Biological Relativity emphasizes the multi-level, interconnected nature of musical development. It encourages us to consider how individual creativity, group dynamics, cultural contexts, and technological factors all interact to shape musical evolution.
3. Assembly Theory offers tools for quantifying musical complexity and understanding the role of historical contingency in musical development. It also provides insights into why certain musical elements persist and how complex musical phenomena can emerge from simpler components.

5.2 Synthesizing the Approaches

By combining insights from these three theories, we can develop a more comprehensive understanding of musical evolution:

1. Multi-level selection: Incorporating ideas from both Neo-Darwinism and Biological Relativity, we can consider how selection operates at multiple levels in music – from individual musical ideas to entire genres and cultural movements.
2. Complexity and fitness: Assembly Theory’s concept of the assembly index can be integrated with Neo-Darwinian ideas of fitness to explore how musical complexity relates to cultural success and longevity.
3. Historical contingency and network effects: Combining Assembly Theory’s emphasis on history with Biological Relativity’s focus on network interactions can help explain how musical evolution is shaped by both past developments and current interconnections.
4. Emergent properties and cultural functions: Assembly Theory’s concept of emergent function can be linked with Biological Relativity’s multi-level causation to explore how music develops new cultural and social roles over time.

5.3 Implications for Musicology and Cultural Studies

The application of these biological evolution theories to music has several important implications:

1. Interdisciplinary approach: It encourages greater collaboration between musicologists, cultural theorists, and evolutionary biologists.
2. Quantitative analysis: Concepts like the assembly index provide new tools for quantitative analysis of musical complexity and evolution.
3. Holistic understanding: The synthesis of these theories promotes a more holistic understanding of musical change that considers multiple levels of causation and influence.
4. Predictive potential: While cultural evolution is highly complex, these frameworks may offer some predictive power in understanding future trends in musical development.
5. Educational applications: These evolutionary perspectives could inform music education by highlighting the interconnected nature of musical development and the importance of historical context.

6. Conclusion

The application of modern theories of biological evolution – Neo-Darwinism, Biological Relativity, and Assembly Theory – to the evolution of music provides a rich set of tools for understanding how music develops and diversifies over time. Each theory offers unique insights:

• Neo-Darwinism provides a foundational framework for understanding variation, inheritance, and selection in musical evolution.
• Biological Relativity emphasizes the multi-level, interconnected nature of musical development and the importance of considering broader contexts.
• Assembly Theory offers a way to quantify musical complexity and highlights the role of history and persistence in shaping musical trajectories.

By synthesizing these approaches, we gain a more comprehensive understanding of musical evolution that acknowledges its complexity, historical contingency, and emergent properties. This interdisciplinary perspective not only enriches our understanding of musical development but also highlights the profound interconnectedness of cultural and biological evolution in shaping the human experience.

While these biological analogies can be illuminating, it’s important to recognize their limitations. Musical evolution, as a cultural phenomenon, is influenced by factors that may not have direct biological parallels, such as intentional creativity, rapid technological change, and complex social dynamics. Additionally, unlike biological evolution, musical evolution can involve the revival of “extinct” forms and the intentional combination of disparate elements.

Future research in this area could focus on:

1. Developing more precise quantitative measures of musical complexity and evolutionary change
2. Exploring the neurobiological basis of musical preferences and how it relates to musical evolution
3. Investigating the co-evolution of music with other cultural forms and technologies
4. Examining how global interconnectedness in the digital age is affecting patterns of musical evolution

As our understanding of both biological and cultural evolution continues to advance, we may find even more fruitful parallels to draw between the world of living organisms and the ever-evolving world of music. This ongoing dialogue between the sciences and humanities promises to yield valuable insights into the nature of human creativity, cultural change, and the fundamental processes that shape our world.

References

Butler, M. J. (2006). Unlocking the groove: Rhythm, meter, and musical design in electronic dance music. Indiana University Press.

Cronin, L., Guttenberg, N., Krasnogor, N., Maaranen, J., Marsh, B., & Yosinski, J. (2021). Natural and artificial molecular replicators. Nature Reviews Chemistry, 5(3), 168-181.

Dawkins, R. (1976). The selfish gene. Oxford University Press.

Ennis, P. H. (1992). The seventh stream: The emergence of rocknroll in American popular music. Wesleyan University Press.

Escott, C., & Hawkins, M. (1991). Good rockin’ tonight: Sun Records and the birth of rock ‘n’ roll. St. Martin’s Press.

Friedlander, P. (2006). Rock and roll: A social history. Westview Press.

Grout, D. J., & Palisca, C. V. (1996). A history of Western music. W. W. Norton & Company.

Huxley, J. (1942). Evolution: The modern synthesis. Allen & Unwin.

Mesoudi, A. (2011). Cultural evolution: How Darwinian theory can explain human culture and synthesize the social sciences. University of Chicago Press.

Milnes, G. (1999). Play of a fiddle: Traditional music, dance, and folklore in West Virginia. University Press of Kentucky.

Noble, D. (2012). A theory of biological relativity: No privileged level of causation. Interface Focus, 2(1), 55-64.

Palmer, R. (1992). “Rock ‘n’ roll: An unruly history”. Harmony Books.

Shepard, J. (2003). Continuum encyclopedia of popular music of the world: Performance and production. Continuum.

Wilson, E. O. (1998). Consilience: The unity of knowledge. Vintage Books.