Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...

FS

create the rule for a cellular automata that mimic the behavior of an ANN undergoing backpropagation

Edit

To create a cellular automaton rule that mimics the behavior of an artificial neural network (ANN) undergoing backpropagation, we need to design a system that captures the key aspects of neural network training. This is an interesting and complex task, as we’ll need to simplify some concepts to fit within the constraints of a cellular automaton. Let’s break this down and create a rule set:

Cellular Automaton Rules for ANN Backpropagation

Click to open document

I’ve created a set of rules for a cellular automaton that mimics the behavior of an ANN undergoing backpropagation. Here’s a brief explanation of the key components:

1. Cell States: Each cell represents a neuron with properties like activation, error, weights, and layer number.
2. Neighborhood: Cells are connected to others in adjacent layers, similar to an ANN’s structure.
3. Update Rules: The automaton evolves in two phases, mimicking forward and backward propagation in ANNs.
4. Boundary Conditions: Input and output layers have special rules to handle external data.
5. Initialization and Termination: These rules define how to start the automaton and when to stop.

This rule set simplifies some aspects of ANNs to fit within a cellular automaton framework while preserving the essential mechanics of backpropagation. The main simplifications are:

1. Fixed network structure
2. Discrete time steps for updates
3. Local interactions between cells

Would you like me to explain any part of these rules in more detail or discuss how they relate to traditional ANNs?

CopyRetry

FS

show an example run

Edit

Certainly, I’d be happy to show an example run of this cellular automaton. Let’s create a simple network with 2 input neurons, 2 hidden neurons, and 1 output neuron. We’ll go through a few iterations to demonstrate how the cellular automaton evolves.

Example Run of ANN Backpropagation Cellular Automaton

Click to open document

I’ve created an example run of the cellular automaton that mimics ANN backpropagation. Here’s a brief explanation of what’s happening:

1. We start with a simple network: 2 input neurons, 2 hidden neurons, and 1 output neuron.
2. The initial state shows the activation (A), error (E), and weights (W) for each cell (neuron).
3. In the forward propagation phase, we calculate new activations for the hidden and output layers using the sigmoid function.
4. In the backpropagation phase, we calculate the error for each neuron, starting from the output and moving backwards.
5. Finally, we update the weights based on the calculated errors and a learning rate of 0.1.

After just one iteration, we can see small changes in the weights and activations. The output activation moved slightly closer to the target value (from 0.5 to 0.6159, with a target of 0.7).

In a real scenario, this process would continue for many more iterations until the error is minimized or a set number of iterations is reached.

This example demonstrates how the cellular automaton rules we defined earlier can indeed mimic the behavior of an ANN undergoing backpropagation. Each cell updates based on local information (its connections to other cells), yet the system as a whole moves towards minimizing the error.

Would you like me to explain any part of this example in more detail, or perhaps run through another iteration to see how the network continues to evolve?

Cellular Automaton Rules for ANN Backpropagation

Cell States

Each cell represents a neuron and has the following properties:

1. Activation (A): A real number between 0 and 1
2. Error (E): A real number representing the error gradient
3. Weights (W): A list of real numbers representing connections to neurons in the previous layer
4. Layer (L): An integer representing the layer number (0 for input, N for output)

Neighborhood

Each cell is connected to a fixed number of cells in the previous layer and the next layer.

Update Rules

The cellular automaton evolves in two phases for each time step, mimicking forward propagation and backpropagation:

Phase 1: Forward Propagation

1. For each cell in layer L > 0: a. Calculate weighted sum: S = Σ(W[i] * A_prev[i]) for all connected cells in layer L-1 b. Update activation: A = sigmoid(S), where sigmoid(x) = 1 / (1 + e^(-x))

Phase 2: Backpropagation

1. For output layer (L = N): a. Calculate error: E = A * (1 – A) * (Target – A)
2. For hidden layers (0 < L < N): a. Calculate error: E = A * (1 – A) * Σ(W_next[i] * E_next[i]) for all connected cells in layer L+1
3. Update weights for all cells: W[i] = W[i] + learning_rate * E * A_prev[i]

Boundary Conditions

• Input layer (L = 0) cells have fixed activation values and do not update
• Output layer (L = N) cells use target values for error calculation

Initialization

• Randomly initialize weights for all cells
• Set random initial activations for hidden and output layer cells
• Define fixed input values and target output values

Termination

The automaton runs for a fixed number of iterations or until the total error across the output layer falls below a specified threshold.

Example Run of ANN Backpropagation Cellular Automaton

Initial Setup

• Input Layer (L=0): 2 neurons
• Hidden Layer (L=1): 2 neurons
• Output Layer (L=2): 1 neuron

Initial State

Copy

Layer 0 (Input):

  Cell 0: A=0.1, E=0, W=[]

  Cell 1: A=0.8, E=0, W=[]

Layer 1 (Hidden):

  Cell 2: A=0.5, E=0, W=[0.15, 0.2]

  Cell 3: A=0.5, E=0, W=[0.25, 0.3]

Layer 2 (Output):

  Cell 4: A=0.5, E=0, W=[0.4, 0.45]

Target output: 0.7 Learning rate: 0.1

Iteration 1

Phase 1: Forward Propagation

1. Update Hidden Layer (L=1): Cell 2: S = 0.10.15 + 0.80.2 = 0.175 A = sigmoid(0.175) ≈ 0.5436 Cell 3: S = 0.10.25 + 0.80.3 = 0.265 A = sigmoid(0.265) ≈ 0.5658
2. Update Output Layer (L=2): Cell 4: S = 0.54360.4 + 0.56580.45 = 0.4721 A = sigmoid(0.4721) ≈ 0.6159

Phase 2: Backpropagation

1. Calculate Error for Output Layer (L=2): Cell 4: E = 0.6159 * (1 – 0.6159) * (0.7 – 0.6159) ≈ 0.0206
2. Calculate Error for Hidden Layer (L=1): Cell 2: E = 0.5436 * (1 – 0.5436) * (0.4 * 0.0206) ≈ 0.0020 Cell 3: E = 0.5658 * (1 – 0.5658) * (0.45 * 0.0206) ≈ 0.0023
3. Update Weights: Cell 2: W[0] = 0.15 + 0.1 * 0.0020 * 0.1 ≈ 0.1502 W[1] = 0.2 + 0.1 * 0.0020 * 0.8 ≈ 0.2002 Cell 3: W[0] = 0.25 + 0.1 * 0.0023 * 0.1 ≈ 0.2502 W[1] = 0.3 + 0.1 * 0.0023 * 0.8 ≈ 0.3002 Cell 4: W[0] = 0.4 + 0.1 * 0.0206 * 0.5436 ≈ 0.4011 W[1] = 0.45 + 0.1 * 0.0206 * 0.5658 ≈ 0.4012

Updated State After Iteration 1

Copy

Layer 0 (Input):

  Cell 0: A=0.1, E=0, W=[]

  Cell 1: A=0.8, E=0, W=[]

Layer 1 (Hidden):

  Cell 2: A=0.5436, E=0.0020, W=[0.1502, 0.2002]

  Cell 3: A=0.5658, E=0.0023, W=[0.2502, 0.3002]

Layer 2 (Output):

  Cell 4: A=0.6159, E=0.0206, W=[0.4011, 0.4012]

Subsequent Iterations

The process would continue for more iterations, gradually adjusting the weights to minimize the error between the output and the target value.